. hide. . The Germans have superior forces, but their troop numbers and supplies are choked by the railway's limited access. share. level 1. Press J to jump to the feed.
If you love to imagine the planet-exploding battles of the fictional gods who will never be, taking pointless knowledge gathered from a life spent reading and gaming and swinging it like a gladiator's sword in discussions on reddit... then welcome home, my friend. Best Defense: Let's say Germany and Japan won WW2 and turned on each other. Great answers for Japan, but if we do a sit down comparison between the two we find that the Japanese were vastly weaker. but for the ruthless Factor its important to notice that other than the japanese (or any nation before or after ww2) the germans build up and perfected a industrial killing complex working in an effectiveness very few country's could match should they try to do so. 1 of 3 Go to page. The Japanese were very gallant men. GregP Registered User Registered: 15-Dec-2014 Posts: 620. This is a hypothetical question so we will eliminate distance and logistics. The Japanese army was very much like ours in a sense. Many thousands of Koreans and Chinese join the German forces, and occupied Europe is compelled by the Germans to provide several large forces as well. They sent in troops by transport ships, and unloaded them in the Norwegian harbor. Should they use the V-2 Rockets or survived long enough to develop a dirty bomb, Japan would have to submit to Germany. Good luck keeping the french down forever let alone the entirety of Russia. the japanese infantry soldier was a lot tougher than german landsers, Absolutely merciless both to the enemy and themselves. What type of AR-15 did Breonna Taylor have in her photos with the weed? If you'd like to elaborate on your original comment to improve it, reply to this comment with your edited version and I will determine if the new comment is acceptable. Germany vs Japan? save. But the German didn’t have the tenacity of the Japanese.". Yeah, I think they unloaded, or were going to use transport ships, to put troops ashore on Crete, but the Brits made them think twice about it. Watch next time on /u/MericanBison's historically dubious hypothetical situations where the Thais manage to take over East Asia, the Third Reich falls into decline, and the Americans take over the British empire.
Press J to jump to the feed. . Who would win the fight for control of the whole world? Comment removed by moderator 2 minutes ago. Here’s why—and what it means for the country’s economy. Global Oriental, 318 pp., 2006, £50 (cloth) The author of this Japan had maybe the biggest navy in the world at the time, or atleast one of them, but mainland armorments were ancient for most intents and purposes. No other countries involved means its a naval engagement. Let's say Germany and Japan won WW2 and turned on each other.
Let's say Germany and Japan won WW2 and turned on each other.
World War II - General. Germany controls most of continental Europe, and you bet it's going to be sending in tons of Hungarian and Romanian troops to fight the Japanese. best. On land, the Germans would just steamroll them with thier armor. Who was the tougher World War II enemy... China Learns the Hard Way That Money Can’t Buy You Love, Iraq’s Future Isn’t Oil, It’s Sustainable Electricity, Trump’s Foreign-Policy Adventures Haven’t All Flopped.
Imperial Japan. the sheer volume of german war crimes in ww2 is so huge it makes a generalization of the topic futile. were followed and they did get their post and Red Cross parcels. In 1948, Japan officially surrenders and gives all of its territory to the Nazis. (1998) Japanese-German Business Relations: Co-operation and Rivalry in the Interwar Period (Nissan Institute/Routledge Japanese Studies) (1998)
The Idea of Nazi Germany invading Imperial Japan, is an even bigger joke than Nazi Germany invading the US. Where the US and Germany attacked shipping, the Japanese soley attacked military ships. If anything, the Japanese would have been able to land troops in Germany and could more than likely have put up a decent fight against the Germans. Many die, but the Germans just don't give a fuck here and demand less cry more work. The Japanese have the advantage on the surface with their carriers, navy planes, battleships, and experience in fleet battles. I really don't care or know who would win a fight between Germany and Japan. 13 comments. WW2 Nazi Germany vs. WW2 Japan. best. Depends on your point of view. The Germans undertake a massive effort to enlarge their Trans-Siberian routes. The Japanese military was considerably smalled, worse equipped and more poorly trained that the German army. The Germans enact swift justice and destroy this force. High estimates have Japan killing more than 30 million civilians.
Germany vs Japan Thread starter Thorlifter; Start date Jun 18, 2007; Who would of won? The Japanese do a better job initially, but the Germans simply have better soldiers. well at the beginning of the war Japan would I suspect. Wheras Germans are of a similiar culture as Britain.
For example, although Germany sent troops t… The Germans made no amphibious landings anywhere that I am aware of, they either were flown in, jumped in or were trucked in to the fight. They didn’t know how to handle combined arms-the artillery and the support of the infantry-to the same extent we did. Assuming this is just a war between Japan and Germany and everyone else is neutral and stays out then there is no way Japan loses this. These advisors brought the militaristic approach to modernization which worked in Prussia, and later Germany, to Japan. And we had to do that right on Guadalcanal. Moving with my mom to my cousin's place in Homestead, Florida next week how to prepare and what will it be like down there? . This was done so that their pilots would be all be elite and very skilled. What are the targets? Just about every German that went to Crete jumped in. but for the ruthless Factor its important to notice that other than the japanese (or any nation before or after ww2) the germans build up and perfected a industrial killing complex working in an effectiveness very few country's could match should they try to do so. Tom again: Still, I think the Pacific war, conducted on remote islands where the enemy would fight to the death, probably was the tougher fight, even if the foe wasn’t as skillful or as well-equipped. they would slap them around like little girls when it came to the sea. The Japanese were idiots to think they were going to kill lots of American soldiers by screaming at the top of their lungs in an attempt to bayonet them. To fly from capital to the other, is over 5500 miles, it's a lot more by sea. Who would win the fight for control of the whole world?
the sheer volume of german war crimes in ww2 is so huge it makes a generalization of the topic futile. Shit is going down.
in the japanese mindset of this time both are supposed to kill themselves before they could be captured. Japan didn't recruit conquered peoples to the extent that Germany did (not saying they didn't, as there were a few Indian divisions that fought for Japan). Germany. For example, Nanking, Japan did kill people indiscrimantly in an attack on a city. The Japs, killed every one..gogggle "the Rape of Chunking". I think the country with a nuke would win and as far as I know Germany was closer to having one. are the reasons why i say the germans where far more ruthless overall. Still have questions? Anyone willing to defend the claim that Japan would win against Germany in a hypothetical war? I think it is pretty aburd to act like the Japanese are the only ones with rebellious possessions.
You are indeed where you belong. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Your comment was removed for being less than 6 words; breaking Comment Rule 1: Comments that are a few words and contribute no actual discussion ('lol' or '___ stomps').